Sign in or 

|
juliebwise |
|
|
missyjmiller |
1. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 20 2011, 4:33 PM EDT
In the chapter it mentions using an assessment wall as an RTI method of tracking student progress and using it to visually show teachers what tier certain students are on. Teachers are also given time each week to meet and discuss/plan together. Cards are then moved 4 times throughout the year and teachers visually get to see the progress that students are making or not making. It helps to narrow in on who needs some remediation or intervention strategies to become successful. Next year, my team is making it our goal to incorporate a data wall, but we hadn't thought about marking the student cards to show tiers. I think this would be a beneficial add on. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Andreachiccarine |
2. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 20 2011, 9:18 PM EDT
Chapter five focuses on the implementation of a CIM Comprehensive Intervention Model in an underachieving school composed of 85% of the population receiving Free and reduced lunch, and 41% being ELL. I was initially interested in the comprehensive assessment system that was generated. It is a portfolio of summative and formative assessments. In my opinion the most beneficial part is the data collection form, which is composed of the various assessments, student’s proficiency levels for each, and then also has a section showing the interventions used for each area of child in need. I really think a chart documenting all the assessment results and any interventions could be so beneficial to gear future instruction for the students. The chapter also discussed a school wide assessment wall in the team room, which monitors students, subgroups, and the success of the program. Teachers continue to add data to the wall and teams meet using the wall as a resource to determine areas, students, and subgroups of need. The data cards do not display the student’s names as to promote conversation without competition. This is such a wonderful idea, and could benefit so many teachers and teams of teachers when trying to gear instruction and intervention techniques. The wall also shows visible progress of the students and acts as a motivator to the entire staff. On top of the data collection, the teams plan literacy intervention together, and continue to progress monitor. This school’s vision to improve the literacy instruction and success of students is well planned and motivating to teachers. The chapter was actually motivating to read and had some wonderful ideas that could be implemented in so many instructional settings. Do you find this valuable? |
|
CathiRoberto |
3. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 20 2011, 11:08 PM EDT
This chapter discussed a school improvement design that consisted of 10 features for coordinating and monitoring school improvement in a K-5 elementary school. As I read the chapter I noted the similiarties and differences between this school's model and the one currently in place in our districrt. The Washington School reexamined the way they were teaching literacy and incorporated comprehensive assessment systems to monitor student progress. They used a data collection form which shows a similiarity to our district's current score chart. They also created Litracy Intervention Planning sheets that provided guidance in monitoring and scheduling intervention team meetings.Our IST teachers currently create documentation about student interventions and propose team meeting time lines. In addition the Washington School for Comprehensive Literacy incorporated an assessment wall to facilitate discusion about student achivement during team meetings. Our school used a similiar approach. However we based our data solely on DRA scores. The Washington school used multiple assessments as they felt reading levels did not provide all the information needed to assess student progress. The assessment wall was used to monitor subgroups, individual students, and the overall literacy achieivement in our district as well as theirs. However the Washington School model took it one step farther and held intervention team meetings and created a portfolio that lists various interventions for reading and writing.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
crystalfreed |
4. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 2:42 PM EDT
This chapter mentioned the assessment wall on page 124. Our district uses this to monitor progress. It is really a convenient way to track student’s progress that they are making. It is really convenient to see everything in front of you. During intervention meetings, which were also mentioned on page 128 of this chapter, we get together as a team to discuss students that need interventions or need to be taken out of groups due to reaching goals. The one thing that was discussed in this chapter was the planning sheet. I think this piece of information would add to our RTII methods. It would help to add alignment and be another visual piece of information to track students. The portfolios would also be great to have, so teachers know every option available. This would also provide more consistency.and alignment between classrooms, grades, and buildings. Do you find this valuable? |
|
briannapaup |
5. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 4:03 PM EDT
I really enjoyed this chapter and got so many new ideas! My school uses the assessment wall, but I received some new ideas to make ours even better. I like the idea of different colored index cards for each grade level so there is not a feeling of competition between teachers. I also like using mulitple assessments rather than relying on just one reading level or 4Sight score as my school does. I think this paints a clearer picture of the students' overall progress. Using colored dots to track subgroups is something we do that I would highly recommend as well. One of the other things that stuck out for me in this chapter were the two types of team meetings. I love the idea of having large meetings including everyone and the option for short ten minute meetings for specific students. The literacy intervention planning sheet is also a great tool for recording important information about each student discussed. Overall, it sounds like the teachers and interventionists at Washington School are very motivated and have great systems in place to allow for discussing student progress and professional development.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
ACushatt |
6. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 4:05 PM EDT
The authors implemented Comprehensive Intervention Model (CMI) as part of an RTI approach. A crucial component to CMI is the use of a data collection form for student assessment, which involves the students’ names, lists of assessments, students’ level of proficiency in each of the assessments, and an overall proficiency level for each student. As teachers track students’ progress, they also chart them on a large wall. Students are identified by number and are placed on the chart by their overall level of proficiency based on that week. Stickers are used to identify subgroups, including ELLs and students receiving tiered intervention. Students who are not meeting proficiency and are not already receiving intervention are identified and an intervention team meets to develop an intervention program tailored to each student’s needs. The team meets once a week for up to an hour to discuss strategies. This sounds wonderful! I wonder if a chart on Google Docs would work somehow. Hmmm…I’d have to give this some thought. It seems like a hand-made chart on a wall is “old school”. Do you find this valuable? |
|
ReneeMDecker |
7. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 6:08 PM EDT
As I was reading about the Comprehensive Intervention Model I began to see an overwhelming theme; collaboration. We have heard many of our speakers throughout the week so far express how important it is to collaborate. This chapter explained who was involved in the collaboration process, and what happened during the process at the focus school in Wisconsin. At my school we now have grade level collaboration meetings built into our work day, that occur 3 out of 6 mornings before the students arrive. Meyer and Reindl shared on page 128 that in addition to classroom teachers, intervention specialists, reading specialists, ELL teachers, special education teachers, guidance counselors, coaches, and administrators should attend the collaboration meetings in which data is discussed in creating RTII plans for students. I am going to take this information back to my district, because I do feel that it is important for all of the key players that are involved with the students to be present. Through this collaboration not only are we working towards the common goal for what is best for the students, but, we are all growing from each other’s experiences and will in turn have the opportunity to “reflect on our own instruction” (pg. 132).
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
JenniferKilmer |
8. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 6:24 PM EDT
The assessment wall discussed in this chapter caught my attention. Our district uses a similar model, but for reading only. It is amazing to see student growth throughout the school year. We too have team meeting weekly ("Thursday meetings"). During this meeting we focus on talking about our students across the board. I love the idea of using the assessment wall in the area of writing. Does anyone's district currently do this?
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
lindsaymasenheimer |
9. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 7:40 PM EDT
This chapter was filled with many things I would like to take back to my district to implement. Since the essential component of the assessment method is data collection, a form was used to monitor student progress on multiple assessments, not just on one summative assessment. This form really stuck out to me and I would love to use it. Another critical part of their model was the assessment wall, which my district has adapted for just reading as of now. However, I love how they utilized the wall and included reading, writing, and the intervention information. If used correctly, this provides a wealth of knowledge about your students. The collaboration and identification that the students were every teacher's students is commendable, and I feel our district should embrace this idea more.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
stevepatrick |
10. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 7:44 PM EDT
I was so excited when I finally finished reading this chapter, because almost all of the classes and presentations I've been to regarding RTII tell about its background and what it is, but no one ever tells you how to implement RTII and what it consists of. This chapter did that! It explained what the essential components were. It showed how data was collected, documented, and used for each student. It discussed how timely and important collaboration is and what each professional's role is within the tiers. It also discussed how a portfolio of interventions, specifically tailored to each professional, is kept and can be applied with students who need that specific support. I can now start to piece together all of the background I've been hearing about with some of the practical "How To" steps that we all need if RTII is a possibility for our buildings. The positive gains outlined in this particular case study were also overwhelming which provides more credibility for using RTII as a building initiative and for creating professional development opportunities so that all teachers can grow and become better at teaching the kids they serve.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
megsnell |
11. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 7:46 PM EDT
After reading this chapter, the key word that stuck in my mind was "cohesiveness"--something we've learned is important in RtI. Each of the components discussed--the assessment system, the assessment wall, the portfolio of interventions, the team meetings, and the intervention planning sheet--are utilized by all teachers at all grade levels. Everyone is on the same page, working from a well thought-out menu of choices, and following similar routines and structures. This should allow for instructional decisions to be made more efficiently and effectively. Do you find this valuable? |
|
maggiehallman |
12. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 8:10 PM EDT
Chapter 5 had some concrete examples of ways to keep track of student interventions. I use portfolios in my classroom all of the time. However, I have never used one to keep track of interventions. What a great idea.We have a version of the assessment wall in our school, but it is electronic. We pull it up and use a projector for all to see during our student concerns meeting. Because we have a sharable drive in our school, we can see this chart between meetings. I'm not sure which would be better. I didn't realize there was another option. Our student concerns meeting only include team teachers, guidance counselors, and administrator. I liked the comment on page 126 about the whole school having access to the assessment wall so that they can create a feeling that the students belong to everyone. We are all responsible for all of the students. Not having our specialists at our student concerns meeting would probably be a weakness for us. These professional teachers would provide a unique insight. This is certainly something to think about. Overall, this chapter was very interesting and made me think. Having Dr. Dorn speak on the same day that I read this chapter really drove home the content. It's not everyday that the authors of the text book actually present during the class. Do you find this valuable? |
|
debraahicks |
13. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 9:03 PM EDT
I had a particular interest in this chapter because we now have mandatory collaboration time in our district for 3 out of 6 days in a cycle. Since I am a reading specialist, examining student progress at both a grade level and as an intervention team is critical but I was not sure how to approach the discussion with the groups of grade level teachers. The assessment wall provides a terrific opportunity for our meetings. I was particularly interested in how the Washington School was careful to use multiple assessments when categorizing students. In addition, the creation of the feeling that the students belonged to everyone and the entire grade level/ building was responsible for the success of each student. We emphasize creating a "community of learners" amongst our students. The same thought should hold true for our staff.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
debraahicks |
14. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 9:07 PM EDT
" As I was reading about the Comprehensive Intervention Model I began to see an overwhelming theme; collaboration. We have heard many of our speakers throughout the week so far express how important it is to collaborate. This chapter explained who was involved in the collaboration process, and what happened during the process at the focus school in Wisconsin. At my school we now have grade level collaboration meetings built into our work day, that occur 3 out of 6 mornings before the students arrive. Meyer and Reindl shared on page 128 that in addition to classroom teachers, intervention specialists, reading specialists, ELL teachers, special education teachers, guidance counselors, coaches, and administrators should attend the collaboration meetings in which data is discussed in creating RTII plans for students. I am going to take this information back to my district, because I do feel that it is important for all of the key players that are involved with the students to be present. Through this collaboration not only are we working towards the common goal for what is best for the students, but, we are all growing from each other’s experiences and will in turn have the opportunity to “reflect on our own instruction” (pg. 132)."Renee - It is nice to validate what we are doing in our district as move to collaborative meeting time. I agree that more of the "key players" need to be present when creating RTII plans. Perhaps scheduling a day in the cycle specifically for this purpose would be helpful. I also believe that having the time during collaboration to reflect on our instruction is critical for growth in both teacher and student to occur. Do you find this valuable? |
|
allisonwhing |
15. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 9:14 PM EDT
After Linda Dorn's presentation, I was excited to read this chapter to see how a school has implemented CIM. I think the data collection form was really very valuable. Using common data would give teachers something common to talk about during collaboration time that is focused on student achievement. I also enjoyed reading about the way they use their assessment wall. I've used assessment walls in other districts where I have worked and we were always looking for new ways to refine this tool. I really liked how they used multiple pieces of data to determine proficiency and not just one assessment. The fact that teachers names are not attached to the actual cards promotes collaboration and conversation and the idea that everyone is working together to ensure success for all students, not just the students in their own classrooms. Collaboration is also essential to the success of this school and this has been mentioned many times so far as an important component of making RTI successful. The school is also very highly involved in ongoing professional development and provides time for teachers to watch each other and meet to talk about students. I think this school would be a fascinating place to visit! The practical ideas presented were very helpful.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
KristinDonnellyGreen |
16. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 10:21 PM EDT
Loved seeing how all the components of data collection and interventions can be organized.It really needs to be a team effort. Many people working together to make sure all students are having their needs met. We use an assessment wall for our reading scores...It is a valuable tool for teachers to see where all our students are and what services they are receiving.We have used it to "share" children for GR groups...suppose you only have one student reading on a level 16 in your class....by looking at the wall you can quickly see what other first grade teacher may have several students on level 16....I can then ask her if my student can join her GR group. My student will benefit from being in a group with peers on her level. much better then the student being in a group by herself or being in a group that isn't her actual instructional level. Do you find this valuable? |
|
carolynfahs |
17. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 21 2011, 11:43 PM EDT
After listen to Dr. Crouse I was so excited to share the use of an assessment wall with my peers at lunch. One said, "You have to read chapter 5". She was right! This chapter hit on components of the RTI model that would help take small steps forward to getting started in my building. Our district had bought tetra data to house all the data, but not sure how useful it will be due to the fact a team of educators with administrators didn't decide what information would be helpful in determining the growth of a student. I am a very visual learner and having the data of the whole grade right there in frontt of me would lead to a lot of collaborating and intervention strategies. The CMI model is a great approach to helping all students grow. I am part of the RTII team at my building and can't wait to share this book, especially this chapter with my building principal.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Jessitracy |
18. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 22 2011, 10:13 AM EDT
Chapter 5 spotlights Washington School and discusses how the school implemented the Comprehensive Intervention Model. They focused on creating structures within the school for aligning classroom instruction, interventions, and special education. The Assessment Wall is discussed as a critical piece of the RTI assessment method. The wall provides the school with a way to make the data visible, which promotes problem-solving discussions among the “team” of teachers. It allows the teachers and the reading specialists to monitor the progress of individual students and quickly identify students who may be having difficulty. Our district implemented the assessment wall several years ago. We use it to monitor the progress of individual students. If a student is not progressing we can quickly identify him/her, and then as a team decide what intervention would be most beneficial for the student. I also feel that our PLC meetings provide the teachers with an opportunity to reflect on our own instruction and it gives us the chance to share thoughts and ideas with each other. Do you find this valuable? |
|
jenniferstrobeck |
19. RE: Chapter 5
Jun 22 2011, 2:47 PM EDT
I really liked the section on the assessment wall as a part of RTI. The wall provides the teachers with a visual for data on students and promotes problem solving discussions on how our students are responding to instruction. The assessment wall monitors the progress of individual students, progress of subgroups, and the progress of the school's literacy progress. What a powerful tool for teachers to track our students and find ways to meet their needs. I love that the teachers have individual cards on each student and that the teachers track the students and have a visual to see student successes and weaknesses. I like the idea of housing the chart in a reading room so meetings can be held in that room and the data being discussed is right on the pocket chart. I am going to try a data wall with the teachers in my building next year. I think it will be a very powerful tool for everyone!
Do you find this valuable?
|